
March/April 2002
You can now receive
our news and information via e-mail. Click the 'Join List' button:
Guide
Offers Advice on Starting, Strengthening Farmers' Markets
Nothing beats
the freshness and taste of the farm produce and locally made goods
that are sold at area farmers' markets. These markets not only
provide communities with products straight from their local producers,
but they also offer tangible benefits to the community in the
form of economic health.
If your
community is looking to start a farmers' market, and needs advice
on getting started, check out Starting and Strengthening Farmers'
Markets in Pennsylvania, a revised and updated guide now available
from the Center for Rural Pennsylvania.
The guide,
which was originally published in 1994 by the Center and Penn
State Cooperative Extension - Lehigh County Office, offers basic
advice on how to get a farmers' market up and running, and how
to use various promotional tools and advertising tactics to keep
it going strong.
Getting
started
Often, the toughest part of any new project is getting started.
And just as the title suggests, Starting and Strengthening
Farmers' Markets in Pennsylvania will help any community do
just that. The guide offers step-by-step points on how to form
a team, find sponsors, develop a marketing strategy, and establish
an organizational structure for the market.
For example,
the guide suggests that the first step to starting a market is
to put together a team. The team's prime responsibility is to
find growers who would be interested in participating in the market.
The team should find enough interested growers to achieve a critical
mass of vendors, a suggested minimum of three.
A nice
mix of growers, bakers, and vendors who offer plants and producer-made
crafts, will also enhance the market's overall appeal to consumers.
Finding
a sponsor who is able to offer some initial capital to get things
up and running, and conducting an exploratory meeting directed
toward other potential sponsors and vendors are other practical
tips offered.
Market
Strategy
After the team and meeting participants agree that there is a
need and a desire to start the farmers' market, the group should
answer four important questions to develop a strategy for the
farmers' market. By answering the questions, the farmers' market
team will be able to set objectives, and define and learn more
about the market's targeted customers.
To recruit
farmers for a seasonal market, the market team should provide
farmers with some idea of their sales potential, which can be
done by calculating the market's "share point." A share
point is a marketing tool used to estimate the market's potential
sales. The more share points a market is able to capture, the
higher the sales for each farmer.
The formula
for determining share points is provided in the guide, along with
a sample.
A lesson
on organizational structure and the definitions of vendor types
wraps up the section on starting a market.
Promote,
promote, promote
The second section of the guide takes a look at promotion and
advertising, and is helpful to both newly forming markets and
existing ones. The tactics covered include developing a logo,
signage, and printed promotional materials; working with the media;
conducting promotional activities; placing ads in print; placing
ads on TV and radio; using direct mail; and developing a website.
The tips include the pros and cons of each activity, and the how-tos
of tackling them.
Finally,
the guide includes sample surveys, meeting announcements, and
bylaws, and a listing of additional resources.
Want
more info?
For a copy of the guide, Starting and Strengthening Farmers'
Markets in Pennsylvania, call the Center for Rural Pennsylvania
at (717) 787-9555 or email info@ruralpa.org.
Chairman's Message
Those of us who live in rural Pennsylvania wake up every day with
something to celebrate. Living and working in a rural community
are opportunities most of us take for granted. But on May 7th,
we all will have the chance to stand up for rural Pennsylvania
as we join with people across America in a nationwide celebration
called Stand Up for Rural America.
What is
Stand Up for Rural America? It is a national initiative to
help rural communities gain the resources and policy support they
need to prosper. As a result of this initiative, funds were secured
through the U.S. Department of Agriculture to build nonprofit
programs to support rural community development. A network of
roughly 750 rural community developers was organized and continues
to educate local government leaders, lenders, and agencies that
provide funding.
Stand
Up for Rural America is helping to educate national policy
makers by assisting the Congressional Rural Caucus in advocating
for programs and policies that support grassroots organizations
in efforts to invigorate rural communities.
The Pennsylvania
General Assembly will join in this celebration through the adoption
of resolutions. The legislative members of the Center for Rural
Pennsylvania will be joined by our colleagues from urban and suburban
areas in recognizing the special needs and opportunities of the
Keystone State's rural communities. Pennsylvania's rural legislators
represent the nation's largest rural population of 3.7 million
people.
Please
join us in this rural "reaching out" as we ask our friends
and neighbors to appreciate the challenges and opportunities faced
by Pennsylvania's rural communities. We have lots of success stories
to share, plenty of worthwhile projects and programs to emulate,
and plenty of issues and problems that need to be worked on and
worked out. With the continued help of grassroots organizations,
along with state and national rural advocates and leaders like
those involved in Stand Up for America, we'll continue
down the rural road to success.
I always
enjoy traveling around Pennsylvania's rural countryside as I traverse
the commonwealth on legislative business, especially during the
summer months. I frequently stop at local farmers' markets to
buy fresh produce and crafts directly from the people who raise
it or make it. One of the Center for Rural Pennsylvania's most
popular publications, which is a tool for anyone interested in
starting a farmers' market, has been revised and updated from
its original 1994 edition. Starting and Strengthening Farmers'
Markets in Pennsylvania was first published with the help
of Penn State's Cooperative Extension staff from Lehigh County.
Our feature article highlights the updated publication. We know
it will continue to be a useful guide for our agricultural entrepreneurs
who are interested in direct marketing.
I'm sure
you will find the remaining articles about the Keystone Development
Center and study of rural chamber of commerce directors interesting.
And, don't miss the survey information for specialty crop producers
being conducted by Penn State.
As we
approach this year's growing season, we are mindful of the lack
of moisture during the winter months and what it could mean for
this year's crops and groundwater table. I encourage everyone
to do their part in conserving water as we heed the warnings of
drought conditions in Pennsylvania.
Hoping for rain,
Representative
Sheila Miller
Celebrate Rural
America on May 7
Join the campaign to Stand Up For Rural America.
This national
coalition initiative is designed to help rural community developers
gain the resources and policy support their work deserves. May
7, 2002 has been designated as Stand Up for Rural America Day,
so take time on that day to show support for rural America by
joining the campaign.
The campaign
is currently in its second phase. During Phase 1, the campaign
met four goals: secured funding for the first nonprofit capacity
building program - the Rural Community Development Initiative
(RCDI) - in USDA; helped stimulate a Rural Funders Affinity Group
in the Council on Foundations; helped generate at least five significant
investment initiatives for rural community development; and organized
an umbrella network, involving at least 750 rural community developers,
to continue educating funders, lenders and policymakers.
Phase
2 is focusing on strengthening the network of rural community
developers, increasing opinion leaders' attention and policy makers'
support for rural community developers; and assisting the Congressional
Rural Caucus and others advocating for a national rural development
policy - one recognizing grassroots developers as key engines
for invigorating rural communities.
To join
the campaign as a sponsor or network member, or to learn more
about the campaign, visit the Stand Up for Rural America website
at www.ruralamerica.org
or call (202) 739-9282.
2003
Request for Proposals Now Available
In February, the Center for Rural Pennsylvania kicked off its
2003 Grant Program by issuing its 2003 Request for Proposals.
Qualified faculty from the Pennsylvania State University and State
System of Higher Education universities are eligible to submit
proposals for one-year research grants, with a maximum funding
level of $50,000, or for the Mini Grants program, which run for
nine months and have a maximum funding level of $10,000. For a
copy of the RFP, contact the Center at (717) 787-9555 or visit
our website at www.ruralpa.org.
Keystone Development Center: The Coop Connector
Think of it as connecting the dots. The dots are the hundreds
of cooperatives that operate or are looking to get started throughout
the state and the connecting line is the Keystone Development
Center (KDC), a technical assistance service provider that was
officially incorporated in 1999. By acting as the connector between
cooperatives, the KDC hopes to help them become stronger and continually
responsive to the needs of members.
"We're
looking to become a one-stop shop for any group that needs assistance
in starting or growing a cooperative," says Cheryl Cook,
executive director of the KDC, which is funded through grants
from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the state Department
of Agriculture.
Since
cooperative business activity is strong throughout the state and
is likely to continue expanding over the next five years, the
KDC is ready to offer its hand to make the work of cooperatives,
especially those in rural areas, continually viable.
What's
a cooperative?
"The majority of the general public is unaware of what a
cooperative is and how it could benefit them," Cook says.
"Traditionally, rural areas have been underserved in many
areas, and cooperatives can offer a way to provide goods and services
that may not necessarily be available."
For the
record, a cooperative is a democratically controlled business
or service organization where its members make policies and decisions.
Profits are distributed based on the involvement or contribution
of members and not on financial investment. Since the 1930s, cooperatives
focused primarily on agriculture and the provision of electricity.
Since then, they have grown to encompass a variety of other industries.
To learn
more about Pennsylvania-based cooperatives and their needs, the
KDC sponsored a study of Pennsylvania's 305 cooperatives, whose
estimated annual gross revenues are $45 billion. The study, Keystone
Development Center's Needs Analysis of Pennsylvania Cooperatives,
revealed that cooperatives are spread throughout the state, with
clusters near Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, and include those that
focus on agricultural marketing, housing, utilities, employee
stock ownership, food production, nursery and preschool centers,
and others that don't fit into general categories. Credit unions
compose the largest group of cooperatives (40 percent) in the
state.
While
cooperatives vary significantly in size, membership, and activity,
they share many common concerns. And this is where the KDC wants
to play an active role. The two main goals of the KDC are to facilitate
communication and cooperation between cooperatives and to develop
projects and resources that benefit existing and up-and-coming
cooperatives.
Beyond
the traditional
The KDC also hopes to expand its cooperative activities assistance
beyond those of traditional agriculture to include such activities
as helping health care workers find ways to share transportation
resources and helping homeowners and seniors meet their housing
needs. Possible future avenues include assisting cooperatives
that work with housing, transportation, consumer cooperatives,
and those providing assistance to the elderly. That's not to say
that agriculture will be left out of the mix: a current project
of the KDC involves assisting grain farmers in determining the
economic potential of an ethanol cooperative.
"Cooperatives
offer a real way to address problems in rural Pennsylvania,"
Cook says. "They fulfill the need for goods or services that
rural residents are not getting, or goods or services that the
market can't or won't provide.
"By
reaching out to cooperatives from varied fields and facilitating
cooperation among them, the KDC can make a difference," Cook
says.
For more
information about the KDC, or a copy of its study, call (717)
243-2765 or go online at www.keystonedc.org.
Chambers of Commerce
Directors Remain Optimistic
Pennsylvania Chambers of Commerce directors continue to voice
optimism about the state of the economy, according to a survey
conducted by the Center for Rural Pennsylvania. Despite the recent
economic decline, the majority of respondents thought growth and
expansion would continue in rural areas.
As a follow-up
to a survey conducted in 1999, the Center for Rural Pennsylvania
surveyed about 50 percent of Pennsylvania's 61 rural chambers
of commerce directors by phone in August 2001. The survey was
designed to measure perceptions about economic conditions within
the directors' communities. Although the results of the survey
are not indicative of the overall state of economic affairs, they
do give a good overview of the perceptions and attitudes of chamber
of commerce directors. Used as a benchmark, the survey results
provide a gauge of perceived economic performance in rural areas.
According
to the survey, directors are optimistic about new business openings.
About 55 percent said there was an increase in new business openings.
Over the next 12 months, 94 percent of these directors believe
that this trend will continue and 77 percent indicated that new
businesses will primarily be small businesses. Also, 94 percent
said that existing businesses have either expanded or maintained
current levels.
Twenty-nine
percent of respondents indicated that employment had increased
over the last 12 months, as compared to 66 percent that said so
during the 1999 survey. However, 65 percent said that employment
will increase over the next 12 months. More than 50 percent of
all respondents indicated they have experienced difficulties in
recruiting workers over the past 12 months, a trend that 94 percent
of those experiencing difficulties expected to continue during
the next year.
Almost
65 percent of directors responded that agriculture was important
to their local economy. Oddly, agriculture is one of the least
represented portions of the economy in the chambers of commerce,
with 26 percent of directors indicating that they have no representation
from agriculture. Among those with agricultural representation,
90 percent said that this section composed less than 10 percent
of their membership. In comparison, service comprises 42 percent
of chamber membership, followed by retail with 32 percent and
health care and manufacturing with 7 percent each. Of the chambers
with agricultural representation, almost 74 percent said they
are either not active or active at a low level.
The highest
rated economic issues are: workforce training, business start-up
financing, the cost of employee benefits, outmigration of youth,
and the development and upgrade of public infrastructure. For
each of these issues, more than 65 percent of the directors said
that they are "very important."
In regard
to quality of life in rural areas, commerce directors remain optimistic
about their areas, although admitting shortfalls in certain sectors.
Seventy-one percent indicated that public education is either
good or excellent, which is close to the 70 percent that indicated
so during the 1999 survey. Seventy-one percent also indicated
that access to healthcare is good to excellent.
Transportation
continues to be a problem for rural areas. More than 48 percent
responded that the availability of transportation is either poor
or very poor, and 42 percent indicated that it is either fair
or good. The availability of advanced telecommunications services
appeared better. The percentage that indicated that access is
either poor or very poor went down from 29 percent in the 1999
survey to 13 percent in the 2001 survey.
Overall,
the survey indicates that chamber of commerce directors, despite
being less confident overall than in previous surveys, continue
to foresee economic growth for rural Pennsylvania. For a copy
of the results, contact the Center for Rural Pennsylvania at (717)
787-9555, or email info@ruralpa.org.
Did you know .
. .
- More than 56
percent of the homes in small Pennsylvania communities rely
on wells or springs for drinking water, and 65 percent do
not have public sewage systems.
- Pennsylvania's
first municipality, established in 1682, was Chester Township,
Delaware County.
- Pennsylvania consumers
drink 2.4 billion pounds of milk annually.
Update Census
2000: Summary File 2 Released
The newest Census 2000 numbers are the SF2 (Summary File 2) data,
whose release began in December 2001, and which should be complete
in March 2002. This file includes breakdowns of all the SF1 population
and housing information for the 249 detailed race and Hispanic
origin groups. So, for example, we will be able to find out how
many Samoans in Pennsylvania are homeowners or how many Whites
in
Harrisburg are 85 years old or older. As long as the population
examined is not too small to breach confidentiality, the data
can be obtained. In other words,
- no tables are
available for geographic areas having a population of less
than 100, and
- tables are repeated
only for the race groups and Hispanic or Latino groups having
a population of 100 or more within the geographic area.
There
are 249 race/ethnic groups partly because respondents were permitted
for the first time in Census history to self-identify with more
than one race. There were 6 possible race categories (White, Black
or African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific
Islander, American Indian and Alaska Native, and some other race).
The Asian, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander, and American
Indian and Alaska Native groups are further broken into subcategories.
Plus, there was the question of whether or not the respondent
was of Hispanic or Latino origin.
The data
will be downloadable from the Census Bureau's website in a lengthy
series of zipped files. Rest assured that the masses of information
will be compiled and made readable, and be available through the
Center for Rural Pennsylvania in its role as an affiliate of the
Census Bureau's State Data Center Program.
The next release we'll be looking for are the county and municipal
profiles, including the sample data (socio-economic information)
due out between March and May 2002.
For more
Census information, visit the U.S. Census Bureau's website at
www.census.gov
or call the Center for Rural Pennsylvania at (717) 787-9555.
The Aging of Rural
PA
Census 2000 data released in the summer of 2001 is evidence that
rural Pennsylvania's population is growing older. The population
aged 65 and older in the commonwealth's predominantly rural counties
grew by more than 9 percent reaching over 420,000. The 85-year-old
and older population grew by 43 percent to reach more than 51,000.
Meanwhile, rural Pennsylvania's total population grew by just
6 percent.
The population
in the state's urban counties is also aging but not as rapidly.
The number of seniors aged 65 years and older grew by just 4 percent,
only 1 percent faster than the total urban population growth.
In 2000,
those aged 65 years and older made up 16 percent of the total
rural population; those aged 85 years and older account for 2
percent. However, children under 18 still compose nearly 25 percent
of the total population of rural counties.
Farmers Urged
to Complete Survey on Specialty Crops
For Pennsylvania's producers of mushrooms, honey, maple syrup,
Christmas trees, and other specialty crops, the last few years
have been challenging. Low prices and adverse weather conditions
have made more apparent the inherent risks of growing these crops.
To assist
Pennsylvania's farmers in finding better ways to manage risk,
the USDA Risk Management Agency, the Pennsylvania Agricultural
Statistics Service, and Penn State Cooperative Extension are currently
conducting a study to assess the use of risk management tools
and how they can be improved to better meet the needs of producers.
Called
the "Risk Management Survey of Specialty Crop Producers,"
the survey began in January and will continue through April. Using
both written surveys and phone interviews, the survey focuses
on information such as crops grown, marketing methods used, sources
of risk in agriculture, and methods to improve crop insurance.
The results
of the survey, which will be kept in strict confidence, will be
used by the USDA's Risk Management Agency to assess the needs
of specialty crop growers and how those needs may be better addressed.
Concurrent studies are also occurring in California, Florida,
and New York.
For more
information or to participate in the survey, contact Jayson Harper
at (814) 863-8638 or at jharper@psu.edu.
More information is also available at http://cropins.aer.psu.edu
under the "Newsletter" section.
Just the Facts: Where
the Boys Are
Rural Pennsylvania, like most places in the United States, is
predominantly female. According to the 2000 Census, Pennsylvania's
urban areas are 52 percent female1, and its rural areas are 51
percent female.
So where
are the boys in Pennsylvania? At the county level, only Centre,
Fulton, and Juniata have more males than females. At the municipal
level, boys are predominant in 15 percent of the state's municipalities.
Of these masculine municipalities, nearly 83 percent are townships
and 17 percent are boroughs. No Pennsylvania city has a male population
greater than 51 percent, and all but one city is more than 51
percent female.
As a group,
municipalities where guys are predominant had a population of
508,000 in 2000, representing a growth of 9 percent from the 1990
figure. These manly municipalities have a population density of
45 persons per square mile and a vast majority, or 88 percent,
of the population in these municipalities is rural2. Eighty percent
of the households own their homes as opposed to renting, and 20
percent of all householders live alone. Eighty-six percent of
families are married couples and 44 percent of families have children.
Children under 18 make up nearly 25 percent of the total population,
and persons aged 65 and older account for 12 percent of the population.
Of the population aged 25 and older, 30 percent have some college
education. Employment is mainly in the services (29 percent),
manufacturing (24 percent), and wholesale and retail trade (19
percent) sectors. Twenty-five percent of the workforce are in
white-collar jobs and 20 percent are in professional or management
positions. Nearly 30 percent of the workforce commuted out of
the county.
The average
income where the boys are is $33,000.
The more
feminine municipalities, however, had a population of more than
8 million in 2000, which shrank slightly since 1990. The population
density is more than 8,000 persons per square mile and only 13
percent of residents are in rural areas. Homeownership is at 66
percent with 31 percent of householders living alone. Seventy-two
percent of families are married couples and, like the more masculine
municipalities, 44 percent of families have children. The population
of children under age 18 is 23 percent and those aged 65 years
old and older is 17 percent. Thirty-seven percent of those aged
25 years old and older have some college education. Employment
tended toward the services (35 percent), wholesale and retail
trade (22 percent), and manufacturing (18 percent) sectors. Sixty
percent of the workforce are in either white-collar or professional
or management professions and less than 25 percent commute out
of the county to work.
The average income was $35,500.
1 For
this entire study, persons living in "Group Quarters"
were excluded so that locations such as prisons, nursing homes,
and college dorms would not skew the results.
2 Much of this data, specifically rural, education, occupation,
poverty, and income came from the 1990 census since 2000 data
was not yet available at the time of publication.
Back to the Top